Loading ...
As a result of of your accountdiscovereda system ' to win each time
to keep their own edgeleadingto our current winner - take - all system
The eventdiscoverthat you may be a winner - take - all system
As longis setup as a one - on - one , winner - take - all system
Increased memorycausessystem lockups win
Our two - partyresultswinner - take - all system
The moveledto the winner - take - all system
to produce an actual winner(passive) is designedThe winner - take - all system
that states do not haveto seta winner take all system
that states do not haveto seta " winner take all " system for
the conflictresultsin a winner - take - all system
foundersdesignedthe winner - take - all system
America?s foundersdesignedthe winner - take - all system
Democratic Socialism / Communismsetsa winner - take - all system
Utah ... a seven - run seventh inningto setup a winner - take - all game
But it is impossibleto designa system in which everybody wins
The Dodgers rallied past the Astros , 3 - 1 , in Game 6to seta winner - take - all game
And is it neededto discovera system to win
Any ideamight be causinga Win ME system
And is it essentialto discovera system to win
The last came on a kill down the line by super - sophomore Kennedi Orr , for a 25 - 22 victorysettingup the winner - take - all fifth set
These change the gamecan leadto a winner - takes - all system
tryingto discovera system that picks the winners
the factis designedas a winner - takes - all system
network effects ... unlikelyto resultin a winner - take - all outcome
However , on the presidential level there is currently a distinct Democratic advantagealso resultingfrom winner - take - all rules
positive network effectsmay leadto winner - take - all outcomes
major talentcan leadto wins under any system
tryingto discovera system that chooses the winners
And ... a transformation of the industry will certainly take placeresultin a winner take all outcome
I think it was network effectsleadsto a winner - take - all result
Got it A Review Of horse racing systemdiscovera system that is a winner
it was network effectsleadsto a winner - take - all result
network effectsleadsto a winner - take - all result
up ... the chaebol and the foreign financial capitalists(passive) set ... bythe winner - takes - all system
Deathcausesall the prize be a system
huge incentiveto contributeas the only winners in the system
conflicts of interest among some Defense Department officials with ties to Amazonledto the winner - take - all award
comeback ... the first championship matchpromptedthe winner - take - all contest
That forced the 86 - 86 tiesettingup the winner - take - all finish
in pattern disenfranchisementresultin pattern disenfranchisement
to lock indesignedto lock in
the outcomecan influencethe outcome
to less gridlock than proportional representation of partiesleadsto less gridlock than proportional representation of parties
to two - party political systems and proportional representation systemsleadto two - party political systems and proportional representation systems
the problems(passive) caused bythe problems
the inequality(passive) caused bythe inequality
vote dilutions in jurisdictions affected by racially polarized voting ... even where minority voters can not form a majority in a single member districtcausedvote dilutions in jurisdictions affected by racially polarized voting ... even where minority voters can not form a majority in a single member district
in similar outcomesresultedin similar outcomes
vote dilutions in jurisdictions affected by racially polarized votingcausedvote dilutions in jurisdictions affected by racially polarized voting
to two partiesleadsto two parties
in the state being taken for granted by one party and ignored by the otherwould resultin the state being taken for granted by one party and ignored by the other
naturally to two parties ... while other systems like proportional representation and ranked - choice lead to more than two parties and more moderate leaders whom more people support at least somewhatleadsnaturally to two parties ... while other systems like proportional representation and ranked - choice lead to more than two parties and more moderate leaders whom more people support at least somewhat
to look opendesignedto look open
in a " wrong winner " electionwould resultin a " wrong winner " election
to rewarddesignedto reward
to our income inequitieshas ledto our income inequities
to a two party governmentalmost always leadto a two party government
This distorted and monopolized representation(passive) is caused byThis distorted and monopolized representation
to two partiesleadto two parties
oftenresultsoften
in a handful of states becoming the entire campaign focushas resultedin a handful of states becoming the entire campaign focus
to generateis ... designedto generate
to a severe lack of competition in our electionshas ledto a severe lack of competition in our elections
to be fairdesignedto be fair
the organization of the political spectrum in this mannerinfluencesthe organization of the political spectrum in this manner
to the creation of swing statesledto the creation of swing states
to real concernleadsto real concern
the violence(passive) provoked bythe violence
the violence(passive) provoked bythe violence
to do in the first placeis designedto do in the first place
nothing at allhave contributednothing at all
to rewarddesignedto reward
to lock indesignedto lock in
some to believe that not all votes are equalcausessome to believe that not all votes are equal
in campaignshas resultedin campaigns
in two partiesresultsin two parties
all the voters for the losercausesall the voters for the loser
in no - choice elections where one party has a permanent monopoly on powerresultin no - choice elections where one party has a permanent monopoly on power
in no - choice elections where one party has a permanent monopoly on powerresultin no - choice elections where one party has a permanent monopoly on power