Loading ...
the study ... slow enrollmentresultedin a small sample size
a pilot feasibility studycontributedto the small sample size
Early termination of the studyresultedin a small sample size
This study ... range , 5–45resultedin a small sample size
One disadvantage of this study ... only a few procedureshave ledto a small sample size
The negative result in the current studymight resultfrom the small sample size
Although the present study reportsresultsfrom a small sample size
type II errorresultingfrom the small sample size
Additionally , the study was only powered for its pharmacokinetic endpointresultingin a small sample size
the study ... one university teaching hospitalledto the small sample size
As it was an explorative study , so no a priori power analysis has been performedto setsample size
The main limitation of this study ... the time frame analysedledto a small sample size
Inclusion of only orthopedic injuries and monocentric nature of the studycould leadto small sample size
what is meant by low statistical power andcan resultfrom small sample size
This retrospective record review study , due to necessary chart exclusionsresultedin a small sample size
that the ROCKET AF study protocol excluded all patients scheduled for ECV or PCVtherefore contributingto the small sample size
This decision was apparently based on unspecified complications with four horses being excused from the studyresultingin a small sample size
Some limitations of the study related to the duration of the dietary intervention ( 8 weeks as opposed to 12 weeks ) andmay have influencedsample size
A significant limitation of this study is the relatively few cases of cHCC - CC that were encountered and suitable for liver transplantnecessarily resultingin a small sample size
In the current study , logistical restraints due to limited funding prohibited an extended time for recruitmentcontributingto a small sample size
In concurrence with other studies [ 6,8 ] , challenges came up in recruiting participants for the more extensive field studyresultingin a small sample size
limited statistical powerresultingfrom the small sample size
just a flukeresultingfrom a small sample size
The low powerresultingfrom the small sample size
inefficient powerresultingfrom the small sample size
a lack of powercausedy small sample size
the reduced powerresultingfrom the small sample size
recall biasresultedin a small sample size
This study was completely voluntary , with no compensation for participation reflecting a significant attrition rate from those eligible , to initial consent , and to final completion of the postsurveyleadingto a small sample size
Barriers to participation in the study , including patients lacking a legally authorized representative ( LAR ) or consent denied by a LAR , or patients meeting clinical exclusion criteriaresultedin a small sample size
using power analysisto setsample size
As a consequence it is done in minimum frequencyresultingin a small sample size
the noiseresultingfrom the small sample size
data limitations(passive) caused bythe small sample size
wide confidence limitsresultingfrom small sample size
just a statistical artifactresultingfrom small sample size
Based on the low response rate on certain questions ,thus resultingin a small sample size
a misrepresentation of dataresultingfrom a small sample size
the trial dataresultingfrom the small sample size
expression datasetwith small sample size
to a probable type II errorleadingto a probable type II error
to a risk of type II errorleadsto a risk of type II error
in a large type II errorresultingin a large type II error
to bias resultscan leadto bias results
possible bias(passive) caused bypossible bias
the values bias(passive) caused bythe values bias
to potential biasmay leadto potential bias
in a sample biascould have resultedin a sample bias
publication biasshall influencepublication bias
downward bias(passive) caused bydownward bias
in a type II error at the time of univariate and multivariate analysisresultingin a type II error at the time of univariate and multivariate analysis
selection bias in our studymay have ... causedselection bias in our study
possible selection biascreatingpossible selection bias
to a type II error ( failure to reject a false null hypothesisleadingto a type II error ( failure to reject a false null hypothesis
the potential statistic bias(passive) caused bythe potential statistic bias
in a bias toward the nullresultedin a bias toward the null
to a false negative conclusion or type II error , which can be beneficial in meta - analysismay leadto a false negative conclusion or type II error , which can be beneficial in meta - analysis
type II error , which may prevent healthy evaluation of significance in the " after scoresmay have causedtype II error , which may prevent healthy evaluation of significance in the " after scores
unknown source of bias in the findingscould causeunknown source of bias in the findings
to a Type II error , i.e. , acceptance of the null hypothesis when there exists a difference because of a lack of power to detect itcould leadto a Type II error , i.e. , acceptance of the null hypothesis when there exists a difference because of a lack of power to detect it
to a lack of statistical significance in our reportmay contributeto a lack of statistical significance in our report
to biased resultscan leadto biased results
to a type II error ... and that key migraine components ( such as lateralization , stress , and hydration status ) may also confound these datamay have contributedto a type II error ... and that key migraine components ( such as lateralization , stress , and hydration status ) may also confound these data
in estimations with very large bias or standard errormight resultin estimations with very large bias or standard error
its limitations for the generalizability of the resultsalso createsits limitations for the generalizability of the results
in a selection bias that might have affected our findings as wellcould have resultedin a selection bias that might have affected our findings as well
Limitation of these results(passive) is caused byLimitation of these results
the obtained resultsmay influencethe obtained results
to under - estimation and result in a lack of statistical significancecan leadto under - estimation and result in a lack of statistical significance
to the lack of statistical significance at 1 monthcould have contributedto the lack of statistical significance at 1 month
to the difference in resultsmay have contributedto the difference in results
The differences in the results(passive) may have been contributed byThe differences in the results
to the possibility of a type II error ... due to the cross - sectional design , cause - and - effect statements could not be made ; and the low internal consistency of the timeliness subscale may have adversely affected the results.2ledto the possibility of a type II error ... due to the cross - sectional design , cause - and - effect statements could not be made ; and the low internal consistency of the timeliness subscale may have adversely affected the results.2
to wide confidence intervals obtainedhas contributedto wide confidence intervals obtained
to negative results in some casesmay have ledto negative results in some cases
to false - negative resultsmay have ledto false - negative results
The discrepant results(passive) might be caused byThe discrepant results
to these vague resultsmay contributeto these vague results
the results from being significantmay have preventedthe results from being significant
to the nonsignificant resultsmay have contributedto the nonsignificant results