Loading ...
Studies with negative results were likely unpublishedleadingto publication bias
In addition , studies with negative results may not be publishedmay causepotential publication bias
Finally , studies with negative results may not be publishedcan causepotential publication bias
Furthermore , some studies with negative results might not have been publishedwould causeunavoidable publication bias
studies with positive results ... negative resultsmay leadto publication bias
as negative results are often not publishedresultingin publication bias
the various factorscontributeto publication bias
Finally , small studies with negative results may not be publishedresultingin publication bias
In addition , certain studies with negative results may not have been reportedmay have resultedin publication bias
positive results rather than negative resultsmight causepotential publication bias
lack of access to unpublished study results data.(Research article(passive) caused byPotential publication bias
The incentivescontributeto publication bias
to publish studies with positive results instead of negative resultsresultingin publication bias
the under - reporting of negative results in the scientific literature(passive) caused bypublication bias
First , some studies reporting negative results may not be publishedresultsin publication bias
the key factorsleadingto publication bias
Investigations of FactorsLeadingto Publication Bias
the main factorscan contributeto publication bias
several factorsinfluencepublication bias
The fact that studies may or may not report negative resultsmay resultin publication bias
whereby only studies producing positive results are more likely to be published.[36(passive) can be preventedPublication bias
that studies with negative results , which showed no trend in favour of either intervention , may remain unpublishedleadingto publication bias
Withholding of “ negative ” results of a study by industry sponsors or researcherscan resultin publication bias
eligible studies ... those published in Englishmight have causedpublication bias
the tendency for drug companies to publish positive results but not negative results(passive) caused bypublication bias
Relevant studies with inconclusive or negative results may remain unpublishedcreatinga publication bias
where grey literature and studies with minimal or negative results may not have been includedresultingin publication bias
24].Study funding patterns ... independent factorsinfluencethe publication bias
a lot of negative results never see the light of dayleadingto publication bias
the reluctance to publish negative results , which precludes a great amount of relevant data highly needed to reject type I errors ( i.e. false positives ) from getting published(passive) caused bya publication bias
disregarding negative results in preclinical studies ( Katz et al . , 2012(passive) caused bypublication bias
We might have missed relevant unpublished trials , which are more likely to be small studies without positive resultsleadingto publication bias
something also helpspreventpublication bias
First , exclusion of conference abstracts , letters to the editors and non - English language studiesmay have ledto publication bias
First , the exclusion of conference abstracts , letters to the editor , and non - English - language studiesmay have ledto publication bias
the positive results of the studyleadsto publication bias
the tendency of reviewers and Editors to reject manuscripts with negative results for publication(passive) may also be caused byPublication bias
Only studies published in English ... our meta - analysismay have ledto publication bias
Only studies published in the English language were includedmay have ledto publication bias
lack of access to unpublished study results data Peinemann , Frank | McGauran , Natalie | Sauerland , Stefan | Lange , Stefan(passive) caused byPotential publication bias
the pooled results(passive) were influenced bythe pooled results
the results of our review.42could also influencethe results of our review.42
The results of this meta - analysis(passive) may be influenced byThe results of this meta - analysis
to misleading resultscan leadto misleading results
the results of this papermight influencethe results of this paper
our combined results(passive) may be influenced byour combined results
to incorrect resultsleadsto incorrect results
the results of the analysismight influencethe results of the analysis
the results ( 83influencedthe results ( 83
the observed results or notinfluencedthe observed results or not
our results lightlyinfluencedour results lightly
SOD results(passive) may have been influenced bySOD results
results as demonstrated by the asymmetry of the funnel plot ... figure 3may ... influenceresults as demonstrated by the asymmetry of the funnel plot ... figure 3
too many significant resultscreatedtoo many significant results
the observed aggregated resultsinfluencedthe observed aggregated results
in under - representation of negative resultshas resultedin under - representation of negative results
our pooled meta - analysis results(passive) to be severely influenced byour pooled meta - analysis results
the present findingshas ... influencedthe present findings
completely opposite results(passive) caused bycompletely opposite results
the results [ 23 , 44may have influencedthe results [ 23 , 44
to these results.60 Secondcould contributeto these results.60 Second
the results for female physiciansinfluencedthe results for female physicians
the results of this review of English - language - only studiesmight have influencedthe results of this review of English - language - only studies
to the over - reporting of significant results.[18 ... Despite thismay be leadingto the over - reporting of significant results.[18 ... Despite this
from the publishing of only positive results of trialsresultingfrom the publishing of only positive results of trials
from non - publication of negative resultsresultsfrom non - publication of negative results
an excessive number of significant results(passive) is caused byan excessive number of significant results
to an inflation in the percentage of significant resultswill leadto an inflation in the percentage of significant results
the results from former publications [ 9has influencedthe results from former publications [ 9
overestimation of the results from the true treatmentcausedoverestimation of the results from the true treatment
to unfavourable results not being published differentiallyleadsto unfavourable results not being published differentially
positive results to become exaggeratedcan causepositive results to become exaggerated
to missing ‘ negatives ’ in the published resultsleadingto missing ‘ negatives ’ in the published results
to under - reporting of studies with small resultsleadingto under - reporting of studies with small results
from the omission of extreme or unlikely resultsresultingfrom the omission of extreme or unlikely results
a higher ES due to unpublished results of null findingscausinga higher ES due to unpublished results of null findings
conclusions.38Economic interpretation of the meta - analysis resultscould have influencedconclusions.38Economic interpretation of the meta - analysis results
to the censoring of studies with non - significant resultsleadsto the censoring of studies with non - significant results
to an overestimation of treatment effectleadsto an overestimation of treatment effect
in only significant results being published and/or being published earlierresultingin only significant results being published and/or being published earlier