Loading ...
the Supreme Court(passive) set byprevious precedent
the Second , Fourth , Fifth and Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals of the United States(passive) set byprevious precedent
by UMG Recordings(passive) set ... byprevious precedent
as a result of a ruling by the Judge in this case(passive) was setA Precedent
only when a judge decides a case and issues a court opinion(passive) is setA precedent
the case is significant and will likely influence future similar incidentssettinga precedent
... , the case is significant and will likely influence future similar incidentssettinga precedent
The BC Supreme Court judge 's ruling in the casewill setprecedent
another recent Supreme Court ruling(passive) set byprecedent
the Supreme Court case , Loving v. Virginiaseta precedent
right to know Court tobacco decisionmay setprecedent
The international courts ruling ... likelyto seta precedent
A leading case ... a decisionsetsa precedent
A landmark legal casehas seta precedent
The results of a case opening today in Edinburgh?s Court of Sessionmay seta precedent
if they do not fight the case and make the family pay the moneymight seta precedent
the legality of its actions in a court of law ... avoidsettinga precedent
a previous decision ( the one I had received but did not read(passive) set bya precedent
a trial ... that would influence future casessettingprecedent
When a court decides a case , we saysetsa precedent
a Supreme Court case that ruled damages(passive) set bya precedent
don?t want ... , and don?t believe the brown water would have caused such an issueto seta precedent
This ruling set by the courtsetsprecedent
If the result of this case is taken by courtsto seta precedent
if the outcome of a case is expectedto seta precedent
Only a majority decision of the Supreme Courtcan seta precedent
Only a majority decision of the Courtcan seta precedent
the ruling ... if they lose at a higher court , then they risksettinga precedent
His action , upheld by the state Supreme Courtseta precedent
forth ... the Supreme Court of the United States in Miller v. Alabama(passive) set ... byprecedent
The following case , decided by the Hawaiian Supreme Courtsetprecedent
the Supreme Court caseseta precedent
the case ... courtsetsa precedent
The actions of federal authorities in iPhone security casecould setprecedent
taking up a legal caseto setprecedent
the Chevron case at the International Court of Arbitrationis settinga precedent
the case he 's preparedcould seta precedent
for the first environmental referendum to decide a mining project in India(passive) was setA precedent
The landmark decision , expectedto seta precedent
It 's been confirmed by the appeal court ruling of 2 September 2010 ,settinga precedent
newspapers to respect the law of the landcausesnewspapers to respect the law of the land
to anotherledto another
to anotherledto another
to the nextleadsto the next
creationsettingcreation
thoughhas been setthough
uniquely long running and expensive international arbitrationsettinguniquely long running and expensive international arbitration
when other counties have taken similar actionssetwhen other counties have taken similar actions
in the correct rulingresultedin the correct ruling
by partnerspaintedby partners
contributions by partnerspaintedcontributions by partners
for future land rights cases and the land claims processsettingfor future land rights cases and the land claims process
for the " next case ... so that future courts could similarly force surgery on pregnant women whose rights would be " decided in the same emergency settingwould be setfor the " next case ... so that future courts could similarly force surgery on pregnant women whose rights would be " decided in the same emergency setting
asideshould ... be setaside
for cancellationssetfor cancellations
in Hammer v. Dagenhart and Carter v. Carter Coal Companysetin Hammer v. Dagenhart and Carter v. Carter Coal Company
for future cases in Colorado as well as other statessettingfor future cases in Colorado as well as other states
how the Court will rule on future casesinfluenceshow the Court will rule on future cases
legal cases to protect our Second Amendment rightssettinglegal cases to protect our Second Amendment rights
the decision of future casesinfluencingthe decision of future cases
legal cases on equality and language rights under the Canadian Constitutionsettinglegal cases on equality and language rights under the Canadian Constitution
Charter / labour law cases at the Supreme Court of CanadasettingCharter / labour law cases at the Supreme Court of Canada
in the famous " Bush v. Gore " 2000 election case , which strengthened the application of the equal protection clause to election lawsetin the famous " Bush v. Gore " 2000 election case , which strengthened the application of the equal protection clause to election law
in a case called Abood v. Detroit Board of Educationsetin a case called Abood v. Detroit Board of Education
law upon which future cases are adjudicatedsettinglaw upon which future cases are adjudicated
to a future request regarding issues of their domestic policymay leadto a future request regarding issues of their domestic policy
prices - pricing competitively and inviting more than one Buyer to set the value in competitionsettingprices - pricing competitively and inviting more than one Buyer to set the value in competition
Supreme Court decisions to professional negligence cases and employment disputessettingSupreme Court decisions to professional negligence cases and employment disputes
environmental law cases that are applicable for our clientssettingenvironmental law cases that are applicable for our clients
for lawsuits proceeding the Roberts v. City of Boston casewas setfor lawsuits proceeding the Roberts v. City of Boston case
judgment that reversed the dangerous trend that had been emerging in the Administrative Law Court rulings regarding Standingsettingjudgment that reversed the dangerous trend that had been emerging in the Administrative Law Court rulings regarding Standing
future cases to comewill influencefuture cases to come
cases on equality and language rights under the Canadian Constitutionsettingcases on equality and language rights under the Canadian Constitution
forth in the tax casessetforth in the tax cases
affecting future similar decisionsis setaffecting future similar decisions
cases including a leading case resulting in a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias against a trial judgesettingcases including a leading case resulting in a finding of reasonable apprehension of bias against a trial judge
gift tax case in the United States Tax Courtsettinggift tax case in the United States Tax Court
all further cases of a similar naturecan influenceall further cases of a similar nature
for other cases of a similar naturemay have been setfor other cases of a similar nature
decisions of the New Jersey Supreme Court , Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey , and United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuitsettingdecisions of the New Jersey Supreme Court , Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey , and United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit