that does not include strict criteriato preventgerrymandering
2 ) strict criteriato preventgerrymandering
to establish political advantage for a particular party by manipulating voting district boundaries(passive) is designedTahoeDailyTribune.com Gerrymandering
Two proposed state constitutional amendments designedto preventgerrymandering
redistricting laws in the United Stateshave resultedin partisan gerrymandering
safe seats for one partycreatessafe seats for one party
in a large number of “ safe ” seatshas resultedin a large number of “ safe ” seats
safe seats that leads to a polarization of viewscreatessafe seats that leads to a polarization of views
safe districts for partiesto createsafe districts for parties
permanent safe seats instead of fair representationto createpermanent safe seats instead of fair representation
many " safe " seats for congressmen almost certain tohas createdmany " safe " seats for congressmen almost certain to
to increased partisanship in Springfieldhas ledto increased partisanship in Springfield
the highly non - competitive districts(passive) created bythe highly non - competitive districts
one - party districts and safe seats for memberscreatesone - party districts and safe seats for members
so many safe seats that many lack incentive to compromisehas createdso many safe seats that many lack incentive to compromise
to create as many " safe " districts as possibledesignedto create as many " safe " districts as possible
the constitutional harms(passive) caused bythe constitutional harms
a very high percentage of safe seats that are not competitive in the general electionto createa very high percentage of safe seats that are not competitive in the general election
to more competitive districts than non - competitive districtsleadsto more competitive districts than non - competitive districts
safe seats ” , where legislators are virtually guaranteed victory every electioncreatessafe seats ” , where legislators are virtually guaranteed victory every election
to extraordinarily safe districtscan leadto extraordinarily safe districts
Safe ” districts for legislatorscreatesSafe ” districts for legislators
in legislative and congressional districts designed to protect incumbents rather than represent the electorateresultsin legislative and congressional districts designed to protect incumbents rather than represent the electorate
increased polarization in Congress(passive) is caused byincreased polarization in Congress
to dysfunction , polarization , and the legitimate belief held by average Americans that , for them , our political system just does not workleadsto dysfunction , polarization , and the legitimate belief held by average Americans that , for them , our political system just does not work
safe ” districts for both Republicans and Democratscreatessafe ” districts for both Republicans and Democrats
safe seats in which the outcome is pretty much known in advance , which is hardly an inducement to turn out and votecreatessafe seats in which the outcome is pretty much known in advance , which is hardly an inducement to turn out and vote
to benefit a political partydesignedto benefit a political party
voting districts that are more uniform in their viewscreatesvoting districts that are more uniform in their views
to more competitive districts than noncompetitive districts and has an ambiguous effect on polarizationleadsto more competitive districts than noncompetitive districts and has an ambiguous effect on polarization
safe districts for the party NOT doing the redistrictingcreatessafe districts for the party NOT doing the redistricting
safe districts ... for particular partiescreatedsafe districts ... for particular parties
safe ” districts where representatives do n’t have to compete for their seatshas createdsafe ” districts where representatives do n’t have to compete for their seats