Loading ...
This prosecutor ... thatwould leadto a final argument for a verdict based on " reasonable doubt " over a witness 's testimony
anti - Black biasinfluencesmock jurors ' use of character evidence ( i.e. , information about a defendant 's personality
informationmight influencewitnesses testimony , prejudice jurors or prospective jurors , or otherwise influence the trials outcome
no waydoesn?t causereasonable doubt in the minds of a jury ... when the only evidence is the witness testimony
by the information(passive) had ... been influencedthe juror 's testimony ... , and the negative response of the remaining jurors
by the information(passive) had ... been influenced bythe juror 's testimony ... , and the negative response of the remaining jurors
Expert testimonydid ... influencejuror judgments ... but the opposing expert testimony diminished the credibility of the defence expert in the eyes of the jurors
such measuresinfluencethe way jurors assess evidence in court
psychological themes such as prejudice , schizophrenia , memory , aggression , brain structure and factorsinfluencingeye witness testimony and jury decision
Oftentimes a defendant who is convicted at trialwill discovernew evidence that casts doubt on the verdict of the jury
a frameworkinfluenceshow mock jurors process character evidence
evidencecould have causeda reasonable juror to question the truthfulness of a prosecution witness
new jury instructionsare designedto help jurors evaluate eyewitness identification testimony
videomay influencejuror decision - making for police defendants Share
Lawyers also routinely use itto discoverevidence about litigants , witnesses and even jurors
how showshave influencedjurors ' expectations with regards to physical evidence
the court 's inherent powerto setaside a jury verdict unsupported by evidence
its developing timelines , graphs , animations , charts , maps or even 3D objectsdesigndemonstrative evidence presentations with jurors in mind
videomay influencejuror decision - making for police defendants
such evidencecan influencejurors decision making in criminal trials
any attemptto influenceRicabal 's trial testimony during the defendants ' trial
informationmight influencetestimony , prejudice jurors or prospective jurors
motionto setthe jury verdict based on juror misconduct
the rape culture in the United Statescan influencejuror decision - making in sexual assault trials
in what manner ; andinfluencesmock jurors perceptions of the defendant
that the jury fails to agree with any of the factsleadingthe jury to disregard the testimony
expert testimonycan influencethe decision making of mock jurors
that the question as phrasedwould causeprospective jurors to prejudge the evidence
the question as phrasedwould causeprospective jurors to prejudge the evidence
The phenomenon ... the factorsmay causeinaccuracies in eyewitness testimony
the potentialto influencejurors ' consideration of their testimony
a meaningful opportunityto discoverbiases of the prospective jurors
social media commentsinfluencedmock juror verdicts
questionsto discoverbiases of the jurors
the factorscausescourtroom eyewitness testimonies to be unreliable
to Roof 's convictionledto Roof 's conviction
to his conviction andledto his conviction and
to his convictionledto his conviction
up to closing arguments Tuesdayleadingup to closing arguments Tuesday
to a particular verdictledto a particular verdict
the verdicts that they renderinfluencesthe verdicts that they render
in a delay in trialresultsin a delay in trial
in a wrongful second - degree murder convictionresultedin a wrongful second - degree murder conviction
to the first - degree murder chargeledto the first - degree murder charge
the Trial Judge to doubt the credibility of the witnessesledthe Trial Judge to doubt the credibility of the witnesses
some controversyhas causedsome controversy
in the awarding of damages much higher than a company expectsmay resultin the awarding of damages much higher than a company expects
to a conviction of murder insteadledto a conviction of murder instead
to the decision to recommend all chargesledto the decision to recommend all charges
to the decision to recommend all charges be droppedledto the decision to recommend all charges be dropped
to tragic mistakesleadsto tragic mistakes
to tragic mistakesleadsto tragic mistakes
to his indictment and convictionledto his indictment and conviction
to the execution of a man he later suspectedledto the execution of a man he later suspected
to the execution of a man he later suspectedledto the execution of a man he later suspected
in a verdictresultin a verdict
in an acquittalwould have resultedin an acquittal
in an acquittalwould have resultedin an acquittal
to the conviction of innocent peoplecontributesto the conviction of innocent people
to wrongful convictionscan leadto wrongful convictions
to a wrongful verdictleadsto a wrongful verdict
me concernto causesme concern
for Oct. 31setfor Oct. 31
or harmed Louisville and Kansasdid influencedor harmed Louisville and Kansas
their decision not to indict Wilson in Brown 's deathinfluencedtheir decision not to indict Wilson in Brown 's death