Loading ...
abrasion of the clearance(passive) is caused byFlank wear
the cutting speed and the interaction effect of feed rate with nose radius of tool(passive) was influenced principally byFlank wear
Frictional contact between the tool flank face and the workpiece ,resultingin flank wear
principally ... the cutting time and in the second level by the cutting speed(passive) is influenced ... bythe flank wear
Abrasion and work material adhesion ... predominant factorscausethe flank wear
abrasion of the hard second phase in a work material(passive) is caused mainly byFlank wear
The feed rate ( 21.33 % ) and the interaction of cutting speed and depth of cut ( 26.67 %influencethe flank wear
abrasive wear of the main cutting edge against the workpiece(passive) is caused byFlank wear
principally ... feed rate , depth of cut and workpiece hardness(passive) is influenced ... bythe flank wear
high abrasion under ( Vc = 1000 m /min , f = 0.1 mm / rev , ap = 3 mm(passive) caused bya flank wear
the type edge impressioncausinga flank wear
Low feed ... likelyto causeflank wear
mostly(passive) is ... causedFlank wear
Plastic deformation of the cutting edgecausesflank wear
many mechanisms(passive) is caused byThe flank wear
the key componentscausingFlank wear
the significant factorsinfluencingflank wear
less ... alloy steel than stainless steel(passive) were caused ... byflank wear
carbide grades MP7130 and MP7140preventsflank wear
mainly(passive) is ... causedThe flank wear
pressures(passive) caused bypressures
the frictional heat(passive) caused bythe frictional heat
mechanicallycausedmechanically
on the cutting edge while rounding the edgewas causedon the cutting edge while rounding the edge
breakage of the linescausesbreakage of the lines
from the machining tests on the coated inserts of Example IV which had an overcoat of aluminum nitride plus titanium nitrideresultingfrom the machining tests on the coated inserts of Example IV which had an overcoat of aluminum nitride plus titanium nitride
principally by cutting speed ( 43 % ... and marginally by interaction effect of nose radius of tool with feed ( 12.84 %was influencedprincipally by cutting speed ( 43 % ... and marginally by interaction effect of nose radius of tool with feed ( 12.84 %
a major level in various toolcontributesa major level in various tool
to inefficient machiningcan leadto inefficient machining
the surface integrity of the workinfluencesthe surface integrity of the work
from the machining tests on the standard control insertsresultingfrom the machining tests on the standard control inserts
less by alloy steel than stainless steelwere causedless by alloy steel than stainless steel
in Cause Action 1can resultin Cause Action 1
premature end of lifewill causepremature end of life
from machining the case - hardening steelresultingfrom machining the case - hardening steel