I would mark orderCount as volatile (to preventcompiler optimization assumptions
However you will needto setcompiler optimization though
The black_goo lines use a volatile variableto preventcompiler optimization
that this technique depends on the registers being declarded as ‘ volatileto preventcompiler optimizations
Because we are spinning at tail in thread2 , tail has to be volatileto preventcompiler optimizations
to low(passive) is setCompiler optimization
the inline keywordcausesa compiler optimization
orderto preventunwanted compiler optimization
Another tip : the variable should be declared as volatile if used in threadsto preventthe optimization done by compiler
the shared memory variable sdata must be declared as volatileto preventcompiler optimizations
For simplicity , this was compiled with -O0to preventcompiler optimization
Plz any tell me about intialising the memory As far as my knowledge when a variable is declared as volatileto preventaggressive compiler optimization
back to the default of(passive) is also setThe compiler optimization setting
to use this informationto designcompiler optimizations
use concatenationto preventcompiler optimization
The ACCESS_ONCE macros and printk are usedto preventthe * the compiler optimizing
the rearrangement and substitution of both program elements and machine instructionsresultingfrom compiler optimization
We did not use any special flagsto setcompiler optimizations
to maximum for use in final applications only(passive) are setCompiler optimizations
& gt ; Even with all_interior_pointers mode off , the collector still looks for interior pointers from the stack and registersresultfrom compiler optimizations
changes I made quite a while back , which I never realized were overly agresive because I do nt use the " release " build(passive) caused byovereager optimization by the compiler
The usersetscompiler optimizations
to Minimum Size(passive) are setCompiler optimizations
to optimize for size(passive) were setCompiler optimizations
to improve code(passive) are designedCompiler optimizations
in the Advanced Compiler Settings dialog box(passive) are setcompiler optimizations
static test buffersto preventcompiler optimizations
typically(passive) are ... designedCompiler optimizations
The pragmamay preventcompiler optimizations
to create faster but equivalent programs , so a mutant which implements a compiler optimization(passive) are designedCompiler optimizations
Additionally I would suggestto setcompiler optimization to " speed
This replaces memcpy with a custom functionpreventingcompiler from optimizing it
smaller and faster compiled codewill createsmaller and faster compiled code
the pin toggle code to be optimized outis causingthe pin toggle code to be optimized out
code to be executed in an order not intendedmay causecode to be executed in an order not intended
errors in multi - threaded codecan causeerrors in multi - threaded code
a security bug in the linux kernelcreateda security bug in the linux kernel
problems with polling for cancellation ... and discussed a few alternatives to solving the problemcan causeproblems with polling for cancellation ... and discussed a few alternatives to solving the problem
towards the total performance of the compiled codecontributestowards the total performance of the compiled code
code rearrangements at the Intermediate Language levelcan causecode rearrangements at the Intermediate Language level
in incorrect code in the presence of data raceswould resultin incorrect code in the presence of data races
to mismatch of source code and executable binarycan leadto mismatch of source code and executable binary
in the same AST as originally presented to the code generation transformationsshould resultin the same AST as originally presented to the code generation transformations
miscompiled code or even lead to misleading backtraceswould createmiscompiled code or even lead to misleading backtraces
racy code to have unpredictable and hard - to - reproduce behaviorcan causeracy code to have unpredictable and hard - to - reproduce behavior
to zero for bit 1<<22 to fix the bug # 3134setto zero for bit 1<<22 to fix the bug # 3134
program to run slower If you can reproduce your issue with a minimal amount of codecausingprogram to run slower If you can reproduce your issue with a minimal amount of code
in executions that are not sequentially consistent behaviors of the original source coderesultin executions that are not sequentially consistent behaviors of the original source code
an unexpected behaviour I implemented a python version of the unfolded codewas ... causingan unexpected behaviour I implemented a python version of the unfolded code
code containing an overflow being omitted or changed in surprising wayscan resultcode containing an overflow being omitted or changed in surprising ways
floating point from working reliably to be a separate bug orthogonal to this issuepreventsfloating point from working reliably to be a separate bug orthogonal to this issue
your troublemight causeyour trouble
False positives(passive) caused byFalse positives
problems v.1.5.7.51 Maintenance updateto be causingproblems v.1.5.7.51 Maintenance update