Loading ...
two of six factorsset forthin Baker v. Carr
four of six factorsset forthin Baker v. Carr
the standing analysissetforth in Baker v. Carr
the standardsset forthin Baker v. Carr
available to a Federal judgecreatedunder Baker v Carr
the six factual contextssetforth in Baker v. Carr
the six - pronged testset forthin Baker v. Carr
political questionssetout in Baker v. Carr
the principlesset forthin Baker v. Carr
the criteriasetout in Baker v. Carr
a retrospective look at how the two differing judicial philosophies of Brennan and Frankfurter , instrumentalist and Holmesian in nature , viedto influencethe outcome of Baker v. Carr
the whole one man , one vote conceptsetforth in Baker v. Carr
the six - factor political question testsetout in Baker v. Carr
the six " political question " factorsset forthin Baker v. Carr
That situationledto Baker v. Carr
Gomillion v. Lightfootledto Baker v. Carr
to the concept of one person , one voteledto the concept of one person , one vote
the constitutional standards for reapportionmentsetthe constitutional standards for reapportionment
to Saunders , the one - person , one - vote caseledto Saunders , the one - person , one - vote case
the precedent for Reynolds v. Simssetthe precedent for Reynolds v. Sims
to Reynolds v. Sims and its “ one person , one vote ” doctrine , which in turn the Warren Court invoked to invalidate Virginia ’s poll taxquickly ledto Reynolds v. Sims and its “ one person , one vote ” doctrine , which in turn the Warren Court invoked to invalidate Virginia ’s poll tax
the “ one man , one vote ” standard for apportionment(passive) set bythe “ one man , one vote ” standard for apportionment
precedent for political gerrymandering challenges to be heard in federal courtscreatedprecedent for political gerrymandering challenges to be heard in federal courts
standards for reapportionment Heart of Atlanta which broke ground on public accommodations for all South Carolina vs Katzenbach which upheld the Voting Rights Act and Buckley vs Valeo which reformed campaign financingsetstandards for reapportionment Heart of Atlanta which broke ground on public accommodations for all South Carolina vs Katzenbach which upheld the Voting Rights Act and Buckley vs Valeo which reformed campaign financing
the framework(passive) set ... bythe framework
from work done with Theodore Carr of Carrs of Carlisleresultingfrom work done with Theodore Carr of Carrs of Carlisle
the same bail and preliminary hearing date for him as Edwardssetthe same bail and preliminary hearing date for him as Edwards
priority for future circumstances as it ’ssetpriority for future circumstances as it ’s
the “ one man , one vote ” standard that is used in redistricting nationwidesetthe “ one man , one vote ” standard that is used in redistricting nationwide
aside the “ political question doctrine ” as an obstacle to the judicial entry to this fieldsetaside the “ political question doctrine ” as an obstacle to the judicial entry to this field
to more equitably divided districtsledto more equitably divided districts
alsocausedalso
precedence for future cases as it is now a requirement for states to produce accurate and exact number of population changes after the censussetprecedence for future cases as it is now a requirement for states to produce accurate and exact number of population changes after the census
to legislative redistricting throughout the nationledto legislative redistricting throughout the nation
a re - districting(passive) caused bya re - districting