Loading ...
that is configuredto createincidents for errors detected in monitored system 110
The authors indicateresultsin an inflated Type I error rate for tests for predictors
any clock skew or delaymay causetiming violations , resulting in erroneous data loading
period counters ... unit 107resultsin the same sets of data being monitored by both error - rate monitoring units
0.0087resultedin an observed type I error rate
only the testscreatedto control Type I error rate when group variances are unequal
In practice , this assumption rarely holds trueleadsto problems controlling the Type I error rate
the unmatched analysisresultedin a type I error rate of 0.4771
exposure to the intervention itselfcan createdifferential error in reporting in the treatment group(s ) relative to the control group
error informationresultingfrom error detection by the error monitor / management system
to very misleadingly small standard errorscan leadto very misleadingly small standard errors
at α = 0.01was setat α = 0.01
a systematic error in all of the calculated % errors within one experimentwill causea systematic error in all of the calculated % errors within one experiment
the groups to appear in fault monitoring group selectors but not in the LMS group selectormay causethe groups to appear in fault monitoring group selectors but not in the LMS group selector
to very stringent significance thresholdsleadingto very stringent significance thresholds
new tasks for health department staff and new communicationcreatednew tasks for health department staff and new communication
many toxicologists to either distrust statistical methods or not to endorse themasa useful interpretive toolhas ledmany toxicologists to either distrust statistical methods or not to endorse themasa useful interpretive tool